ANALISIS ARGUMENTASI HUKUM DAN RATIO DECIDENDI DALAM SENGKETA PPN DI PENGADILAN PAJAK PADA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN PAJAK NOMOR : PUT-005266.16/2023/PP/M.XIB
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.08221/mis.v2i2.316Keywords:
Tax Dispute, Value Added Tax, Legal ArgumentAbstract
The resolution of tax disputes in court is not without its challenges, one of which is the complexity of formulating legal arguments. This study aims to analyze the Tax Court Judge's Decision on the VAT dispute involving PT. Cipta Dwi Busana and examine strong legal arguments in the VAT dispute at the Tax Court of PT. Cipta Dwi Busana. The method used in this research is normative juridical. This study analyzes Decision No. PUT-005266.16/2023/PP/M.XIB of 2024, with legal sources drawn from laws related to taxation and Value Added Tax (VAT). The analysis technique involves linking primary legal sources with supporting theories and literature, including books and journals, and is presented descriptively. The results of this study indicate that Decision No. PUT-005266.16/2023/PP/M.XIB of 2024 fully granted PT. Cipta Dwi Busana's appeal against the Director General's Decision, based on taxation laws and legal arguments. The arguments referenced include PMK 32/PMK.010/2019, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 42 of 2009, Articles 1 Paragraphs 17 and 19, and Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2012.
References
Agasie, D., & Zubaedah, R. (2022). Urgensi kenaikan tarif pajak pertambahan nilai berdasarkan asas kepentingan nasional. Perspektif Hukum, 50–74.
Aulia, I., Machdar, N. M., & Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya. (2023). Upaya hukum dalam penyelesaian sengketa pajak pada pengadilan pajak: Suatu perspektif keadilan. 2(3), 603–620.
Cipta Dewa, R., & Tanudjaja. (2024). Tanggung jawab pidana pada korporasi dalam tindak pidana perpajakan. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 3(3), 96–106.
Gotama, I. W. S., Widiati, I. A. P., & Seputra, I. P. G. (2020). Eksistensi pengadilan pajak dalam penyelesaian sengketa pajak. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(3), 331–335.
Khairannisa, D., & Cheisviyanny, C. (2019). Analisis peranan konsultan pajak terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak dalam memenuhi kewajiban perpajakan. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 1(3), 1151–1167.
Kristanto, A. B., & Noreen, C. A. (2021). Kepatuhan di tengah kompleksitas pajak: Apakah literasi memiliki peran? Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Perpajakan (JRAP), 8(2), 35–46.
Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian hukum (Cet. ke-6). Jakarta: Kencana.
Migang, S., & Wahyuni, W. (2020). Pengaruh pertumbuhan self assessment system, pemeriksaan pajak, dan penagihan pajak terhadap penerimaan pajak pertambahan nilai (PPN). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 23, 1–5.
Suharsono, A. (2023). Argumentasi hukum hakim agung dalam putusan sengketa pajak pertambahan nilai penjualan agunan oleh perusahaan jasa keuangan, 9, 24–38.
Syafi’i, N. L. I., & Albarik, M. R. (2023). Analisis sengketa pajak pertambahan nilai. Equity: Jurnal Akuntansi, 3(2), 111–121.
Umboh, D. Y. (2021). Prosedur penyelesaian sengketa pajak di pengadilan pajak menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2002. Lex Administratum, 9(8).
Wahyuni, W. (2022). Mengenal sengketa pajak dan tata cara penyelesaiannya.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Olina Rizki Arizal, Rizky Karo Karo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
