PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA MELAKUKAN KEKERASAN MEMAKSA ANAK MELAKUKAN PERSETUBUHAN (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Marisa Nomor: 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/Pn.Mar)
Keywords:
Criminal Liability, Children, Sexual IntercourseAbstract
The most frequently encountered sexual crimes are sexual crimes in the form of the crime of sexual intercourse. This act of sexual intercourse is often carried out by adults against minors by seducing, persuading and carrying out tricks on the child which can take the form of words, giving things, and so on, which are done to satisfy their sexual desires. The crime of sexual intercourse with a child is included in the realm of a crime of morality. This crime of morality has become one of the unrest that occurs in society in the life of the nation and state which can damage the mentality of the child's hopes for the future. Sexual abuse of children can cause fear and even traumatic effects on children. As happened in Gorontalo City Marisa District Court Decision Number: 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN.Mar. Where there is a criminal accused of committing violence or threats of violence forcing the child to have sexual intercourse with him or another person. The formulation of the problem of this research is how is the responsibility for the criminal act of committing violence forcing a child to have sexual intercourse based on Indonesian criminal law? and what is the analysis of the legal considerations of the panel of judges in the Marisa District Court Decision Number: 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN.Mar regarding the criminal act of committing violence by forcing a child to have sexual intercourse? The research method used in this research is normative juridical legal research. The approach method used in this research is the statutory approach. Apart from that, the author also uses the conceptual approach method and the case approach method. The research results show that the decision of the panel of judges regarding the perpetrator of sexual intercourse in case Number 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN.Mar has fulfilled the elements contained in the existing legal regulations.
References
Amrani, Hanafi dan Mahrus Ali. Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Perkembangan dan Penerapan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2015.
Mahardika. “Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pedofilia terhadap Anak.” Jurnal Kontruksi Hukum Vol. 1, No. 1, 2020.
Maidin Gultom. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2008.
Mien Rukmini. Aspek Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi (Sebuah Bunga Rampai). Bandung: Alumni, 2006.
Sitompul, Anastasia Hana. “Kajian Hukum tentang Tindak Kekerasan Seksual terhadap Anak di Indonesia.” Jurnal Lex Crimen 4, No. 1, Tahun 2015.
Suryandi, Dody, Nike Hutabarat, dan Hartono Pamungkas. "Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak." Jurnal Darma Agung 28, No. 1, 2020.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 17 tahun 2016 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak Menjadi Undang-Undang Juncto Pasal 76D Undang-Undang Nomor 35 tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Marisa Nomor: 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN.Mar)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Andika Firdaus, Potler Gultom
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
