PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG MELALUI MEDIA ELEKTRONIK BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO 21 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG

Authors

  • Varabella Pravangastha Lara Prameswari Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma
  • Sujono Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma University

Keywords:

Criminal Liability, TPPO, ITE Law

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the criminal liability of perpetrators involved in human trafficking through electronic media, based on Law No. 21 of 2007 on the Eradication of Human Trafficking. The method used is normative juridical research with an approach based on relevant laws and regulations. The findings show that perpetrators can be held criminally liable under two offenses: the offense of human trafficking in accordance with the Anti-Trafficking Law and the offense of misuse of information technology based on the ITE Law. The penalties for these offenses include a maximum prison sentence of 15 years and a fine of up to IDR 600,000,000 for human trafficking, and a maximum prison sentence of 6 years and a fine of up to IDR 1,000,000,000 for the misuse of information technology. These penalties aim to provide a deterrent effect and raise public awareness of the severity of this crime. Law enforcement against human trafficking via social media faces several challenges, including organized crime, the victims' and society's fear of reporting, and weak inter-agency coordination. Therefore, a more comprehensive and integrated effort involving the government, law enforcement agencies, and the public is required to effectively combat this crime.

References

A. I. K. Sonbai. “Kebijakan Formulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pengguna Jasa Prostitusi Melalui Media Online.” Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan Acta Comitas 4, no. 2 (2019).

D. Schaffmeister, A. Pohan, J. E. Sahetapy, N. Keijzer, dan E. P. H. Sutorius. Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.

Dimas Hutomo, S.H. “Dapatkah Pelaku Perdagangan Orang di Sosmed Dijerat UU ITE?” Hukumonline, diakses 7 Juni 2024.

Dudy Heryadi, Deasy Silvya Sari, dkk. Mengikis Human Trafficking: Upaya Kerja Sama Indonesia-ASEAN dalam Penanganan Human Trafficking. Sumedang: Niaga Muda, 2020.

Kantor Perburuhan Internasional. Buku 6: Perdagangan Perempuan dan Anak, dalam Pedoman Informasi: Mencegah Diskriminasi, Eksploitasi dan Perlakuan Sewenang-wenang terhadap Pekerja Migran Perempuan. Jakarta: International Labour Organization, 2004.

Obsatar Sinaga. Fenomena Human Trafficking di Asia Tenggara. Unpad, Semarang, 2010/2011.

Okky Chahyo Nugroho. “Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 18, no. 4 (Desember 2018).

Rochmah Siti dan Frans Simangunsong. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang.” Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 3, no. 1 (Januari–April 2023).

UNDP Regional HIV and Development Programme Team. “Twilight Zone,” cerita sampul dalam You and AIDS: The HIV and Development Magazine for Asia Pacific, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Agustus 2003).

Zia Zakiri dan Mahfud. “Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (Suatu Penelitian Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Jantho Aceh Besar).” JIM Bidang Hukum Pidana 1, no. 1 (Agustus 2007).

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2007 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) sebagaimana yang telah diubah oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016.

Published

2025-02-01

How to Cite

Pravangastha Lara Prameswari, V., & Sujono. (2025). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG MELALUI MEDIA ELEKTRONIK BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO 21 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG. LEX PROGRESSIUM : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Perkembangan Hukum, 2(1), 56–66. Retrieved from https://jurnal.dokterlaw.com/index.php/lexprogressium/article/view/147