PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU PENGGELAPAN FAKTUR PAJAK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.08221/lexomnibus.v2i2.294Keywords:
Tax Crimes, Tax Invoice Embezzlement, ObstaclesAbstract
Tax crimes such as tax invoice evasion undermine the fairness and effectiveness of the tax system and harm state revenues. The purpose of this study is to determine the regulation and enforcement of laws, as well as the obstacles to tax invoice evasion in Indonesia, as expressly regulated in Law Number 7 of 2021. The research method used was a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach, analyzing tax cases. The results of this study indicate that the regulation and enforcement of laws, as well as the obstacles to tax invoice evasion in Indonesia, are expressly regulated in Law Number 7 of 2021, which provides for imprisonment and heavy fines as a deterrent and compliance improvement measure. However, law enforcement still faces obstacles such as lack of oversight, low taxpayer awareness, inaccurate data, and a lack of transparent bureaucracy. Therefore, synergy between clear regulations, effective law enforcement, and increased awareness and transparency are needed to create a fair, efficient, and sustainable tax system in Indonesia.
References
Abduh, M., H. T. M. Pawennei, dan N. F. Mappaselleng. “The Essence of the Principle of Ultimum Remedium Tax Crimes in Indonesia as an Effort to Recover State Losses.” Pakistan Journal of Life & Social Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2024.
Al Kautsar, I., dan D. W. Muhammad. “Sistem Hukum Modern Lawrence M. Friedman: Budaya Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat dari Industrial ke Digital.” Sapientia et Virtus, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2022.
Anggraini, R. P. Analisis Surat Kuasa Khusus Nomor 900/197/BKD KK/2021 tentang Peran Kejaksaan Negeri Kaur dalam Penagihan Tunggakan Pajak Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah. Tesis. UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu, 2023.
Basri, H. “The Effect of Implementation of E-SPT VAT on the Level Compliance Period Taxpayers Inaugurated as Taxable Entrepreneur.” International Journal of Management and Education in Human Development, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2021.
Borah, T., S. Gogoi, dan A. Dutta. “Cognitive Dissonance: Its Role in Decision Making.” Advance Research Journal of Social Science, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2020.
Cipta Dewa, R., dan Tanudjaja. “Tanggung Jawab Pidana pada Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Perpajakan.” Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2024.
Damayanti, N., P. A. S. Ningsih, dan A. E. Ramadhan. “Penegakan Hukum dalam Tindak Pidana Perpajakan terhadap Faktur Pajak Tidak Sah yang Dilakukan oleh PT DC.” Jurnal Lex Suprema, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2022.
Hartono, B., Z. Hasan, dan A. Siregar. “Penerapan Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perpajakan Secara Bersama-Sama.” Caselaw: Journal of Law, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2023.
Indrawan, K., R. A. S. Hernawati, dan N. Pranadita. “Tindak Pidana Penggelapan dalam Perpajakan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2007.” Iustitia Omnibus: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2024.
Khairunnisa, P., dan T. H. Sitabuana. “Tindakan Korupsi Oknum Ditjen Pajak Mempengaruhi Persepsi Wajib Pajak atas Pemungutan Pajak.” Sibatik Journal, Vol. 1, No. 7, 2022.
Moeljatno. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2021.
Rahayu, S. K. Perpajakan: Konsep, Sistem, dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2020.
Rasyid, A. “The Role of Good Corporate Governance in Increasing Corporate Tax Compliance.” Jurnal Info Sains: Informatika dan Sains, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2023.
Refalia, S., S. Sepriani, dan Rasji. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Direktur Perseroan Terbatas atas Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Pajak.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, Vol. 10, No. 8, 2024.
Rusdiana, E. “Pemenuhan Perumusan dan Penyelenggaraan Hukum Pidana pada Pelanggaran Pajak Demi Pencapaian Tujuan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Perpajakan.” Jurnal Suara Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2022.
Rusnan, K., J. J. Koynja, dan E. S. Nurbani. “Penerapan Sanksi Pelanggaran dan Kejahatan dalam Bidang Perpajakan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2007.” KOMASH: Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2021.
Saidi, M. Djafar. Pembaruan Hukum Pajak. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2010.
Saptono, P. B., dan I. Khozen. “How Should Taxpayers Respond to Tax Authority Supervision?” Jurnal Analisis Bisnis Ekonomi, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2021.
Sautma, A. “Criminal Fines Issuing Tax Invoices Not Based on Actual Transactions with More than One Perpetrator.” JUSTISI, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2025.
Sudarto. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. 2024.
Sumarno, S. “The Imposition of Administrative Sanctions in the Form of Interest on Article 25 Income Tax from the Perspective of Justice.” Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2025.
Taqiyyuddiin, M. H., dan S. Wijaya. “Zero Exemption Threshold for Corporation as an Alternative to Increase VAT Revenue.” ACCRUALS (Accounting Research Journal of Sutaatmadja), Vol. 5, No. 2, 2021.
Tomalili, R. Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2019.
Utami, R. D. C., dan A. R. Saleh. “Kajian Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Pajak terhadap Pembuat dan Pengguna Faktur Pajak Tidak Berdasarkan Transaksi Sebenarnya (TBTS).” Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2024.
Wajdi, M. F., dkk. Pengantar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Tasikmalaya: PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2023.
Yoserwan, Y., dan D. Arma. “Criminal Law Policy in the Harmonization of Tax Regulations: Its Implications for State Income from the Tax Sector.” Nagari Law Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2023.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jose Janitra Jaya, Bambang Widarto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
