POLITICAL DIRECTION OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION LAW IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (E-LITIGATION) TO REALIZE THE PRINCIPLES OF SIMPLE, FAST, AND LOW-COST JUSTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.08221/mis.v3i1.256Kata Kunci:
Legal politics, digital transformation, e-litigation, criminal justice, judicial principles.Abstrak
Digital transformation in the criminal justice system is a necessity along with the increasingly massive development of information and communication technology. One of the concrete forms of this transformation is the implementation of the e-litigation system in the criminal justice process. The presence of e-litigation is not only interpreted as an administrative technical innovation, but also as a manifestation of the political direction of national law in building an effective, efficient, and fair judicial system. This article aims to analyze the political direction of digital transformation in the criminal justice system in Indonesia and examine its relevance to the principles of simple, fast, and low-cost justice. This research uses normative juridical methods with legislative, conceptual, and historical approaches. The results of the study show that the implementation of e-litigation in the criminal justice system is a form of progressive legal policy that aims to strengthen access to justice, increase transparency, and reduce structural barriers in the criminal law enforcement process. However, the effectiveness of e-litigation still faces various challenges, both in terms of regulations, the readiness of law enforcement officials, and the technology gap in society. Keywords: Legal politics, digital transformation, e-litigation, criminal justice, judicial principles.
Referensi
Andi Hamzah. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Peradilan Konstitusi dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2011.
Barda Nawawi Arief. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.
Mahfud MD, Moh. Politik Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2017.
Mahfud MD, Moh. Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2012.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2010.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan. Jakarta: Kompas, 2009.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial. Bandung: Alumni, 2009.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Andre Firza Setyananda, Lucky Ferdiles

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










