DOKUMEN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM PERSIDANGAN PERADILAN PERDATA DIKAITKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2024 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK

Authors

  • Nixson Marisi.B Air Marshal Suryadarma University
  • Indah Sari Air Marshal Suryadarma University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.08221/mis.v2i2.312

Keywords:

Evidence, Electronic Documents, Authentication, Legal Status

Abstract

Electronic Evidence Documents have several provisions that can trigger various problems as evidence ranging from collection, storage, and preservation to authentication, validation, and application of electronic evidence, and raise questions about privacy, costs, ethics, and procedural management. The purpose of this study is to determine the procedures for submitting and examining documents, as well as the legal status of electronic documents as evidence in civil trials must comply with the provisions of Law No. 1 of 2024. The research method uses a normative juridical approach by analysing laws related to electronic documents as evidence. The results of the study state that the procedures for submitting and examining electronic documents as evidence in civil trials must comply with the provisions of Law No. 1 of 2024 and applicable procedural law, with the submission of electronic documents carried out directly or through an electronic litigation system in digital or printed format. After the document is submitted, it must be informed to the opposing party for examination and response, based on expert testimony if necessary to ensure the authenticity and integrity of the document during the trial process. Legally, electronic documents and their printouts have equal standing with conventional evidence as long as they meet authentication and relevance requirements and are protected from loss, theft, or unauthorized alteration through a registered electronic delivery service that provides proof of delivery and maintains document security. Numerous court decisions have recognized electronic documents as valid evidence, strengthening their position in the civil justice system as valid and effective instruments in line with technological developments and modern legal requirements.

References

Afanseva, S. I., & Dobrovlyanina, O. V. (2023). On the introduction, development, and improvement of electronic methods of collecting evidentiary information in criminal cases. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 60.

Demirtaş, N. (2024). A general and limited overview of the concept of judicial documents and the use of electronic instruments in electronic judicial process. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1).

Dharma, W. S., Perdana, S., & Moertiono, J. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap data pendaftaran tanah yang dilakukan secara elektronik. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 15(1).

Djuraev, I., Baratov, A., Khujayev, S., Yakubova, I., Rakhmonova, M., Mukumov, B., & Abdurakhmanova, N. (2025). The impact of digitization on legal systems in developing countries. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(1).

Dmitrieva, A. A., & Pastukhov, P. S. (2023). Concept of electronic evidence in criminal legal procedure. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 1(1).

Dmitrievich, S. M. (2022). An electronic document is evidence in a case if: Electronic evidence in court (Master’s thesis). Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.

Fauzi, M. A., Nurmayani, S. H., & Syamsu, M. S. (2021). The position of electronic documents in the process of evidence in the state administrative jurisdiction in Indonesia. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 24(2).

Harisanty, D., & Anugrah, E. P. (2022). Legality of electronic archive management in realizing Indonesia e-government. Digital Library Perspectives, 38(1).

Irawan, H., & Hasan, Z. (2024). Dampak teknologi terhadap strategi litigasi dan bantuan hukum: Tren dan inovasi di era digital. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(2).

Khamidov, B. (2021). General-theoretical issues related to digital evidence: Problem and solution. Norwegian Journal of Development of International Science, 63(2).

Kirillova, E. A., Bogdan, V. V., Golovatskaya, M. V., Melnichenko, T. A., & Ognev, V. N. (2018). Legal significance of electronic messages and documents. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(3).

Marquez, N. Y., Sejati, H., & Tohari, M. (2024). Validity of digital signature evidence as valid evidence in civil procedure law. UNES Law Review, 6(4).

Mariyam, S. (2023). Power of proof electronic document evidence in the court. In International Conference on Law, Economics, and Health (ICLEH 2022). Atlantis Press.

Murdoch, S. J., Seng, D., Schafer, B., & Mason, S. (2024). The sources and characteristics of electronic evidence and artificial intelligence. University of London Press.

Prasetyo. (2021). Evaluasi penegakan hukum terhadap kejahatan korupsi berbasis teknologi digital. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum, 13(2).

Ranchordás, S. (2022). The digitization of government and digital exclusion: Setting the scene. In The rule of law in cyberspace. Springer International Publishing.

Sa’adah, N., Indriawati, S. E., Widodo, G., & Setyowati, S. (2021). Validity of the evidence of the agreement through electronics reviewed from Article 1866 Civil Code. In The 1st International Conference on Research in Social Sciences and Humanities (ICoRSH 2020).

Seepma, A. P., de Blok, C., & van Donk, D. P. (2021). Designing digital public service supply chains: Four country-based cases in criminal justice. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 26(3).

Setyawati, D., & Rizal, Y. (2020). Legal barriers in adopting digital evidence in corruption cases in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(3).

Siddiqi, M., & Ilyas, I. (2025). The implementation of electronic evidence presentation in civil proceedings. Genesis Law and Social Sciences, 1(1).

Sihotang, M., & Hoessein, Z. A. (2025). Transformasi politik hukum dalam penguatan regulasi cyber law di Indonesia. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 6(1).

Stankevich, G. V., Vilgonenko, I. M., Slepenok, Y. N., & Litvishko, O. M. (2021). Electronic document flow as evidence in civil proceeding: Evaluation features and application problems. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 109). EDP Sciences.

Sudarto. (2024). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Cendekia.

Sulistyo, H. (2020). A legal framework for the use of digital forensics in Indonesian courts. Journal of Law and Technology Review, 7(1).

Tran, Q. A. (2022a). The authentication of electronic evidence. In Electronic evidence in civil and commercial dispute resolution: A comparative perspective of UNCITRAL, the European Union, Germany and Vietnam. Springer Nature Switzerland.

Tran, Q. A. (2022b). The significant types of electronic evidence. In Electronic evidence in civil and commercial dispute resolution: A comparative perspective of UNCITRAL, the European Union, Germany and Vietnam. Springer Nature Switzerland.

Vitria, Y., & Basid, A. (2025). Combating corruption in Indonesia: Digital evidence in criminal prosecution. INFOKUM, 13(4).

Wibowo, K. T., et al. (2025). Hukum digital dan privasi data. CV. Al-Haramain Lombok.

Published

2025-10-01

How to Cite

Nixson Marisi.B, & Indah Sari. (2025). DOKUMEN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM PERSIDANGAN PERADILAN PERDATA DIKAITKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2024 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK. MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi, Dan Viktimologi, 2(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.08221/mis.v2i2.312