PENERAPAN PIDANA DENDA PENGGANTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR : 2050/PID. SUS/2021/PN TNG)
Keywords:
Narcotics Crime, Subtitute FineAbstract
In 2021, the Tangerang District Court in verdict number 2050/Pid. Sus/2021/PN Tng, sentenced the defendant to 9 (nine) years of imprisonment for drug abuse and a fine of IDR 3,000,000.00, provided that if the fine is not paid, it will be replaced by imprisonment for 3 (three) months. The formulation of the problem, How is the application of substitute fines in Decision Number: 2050/Pid. Sus/2021/PN Tng ? and How is the application of substitute fines in Decision Number: 2050/Pid. Sus/2021/PN Tng ?. This research method uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach and conceptual approach and uses secondary, primary and tertiary data. The results of the research obtained that the substitute fine imposed by the judge is lower than the maximum fine as stipulated in article 114 paragraph (2) Jo article 132 paragraph (1), namely the maximum fine as referred to in paragraph (1) plus 1/3 (one third), if you look at article 114 paragraph (1) the maximum fine is 10 (ten) billion if added by one third to around 13 (thirteen) billion while the judge's decision is 3 (three) billion. In this case, the judge considers the decision not only for economic purposes or just to increase state financial income, but is related to the achievement of the objectives of punishment, which considers the values of legal certainty, justice and expediency, the application of substitute fines in Decision Number: 2050/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Tng is in accordance with the provisions of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics Crimes. It is suggested that the substitute fine be given to the defendant as much as possible to provide a deterrent effect.
References
Buku :
Bambang Waluyo. Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif dan Transformatif. Cetakan Pertama. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika, 2020.
Muhammad Ali. Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia Modern. Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Pertama. Jakarta: Pustaka Amani, 2006.
Nursiti dan Fakhrullah. "Disparitas Penjatuhan Pidana Kurungan Pengganti Pidana Denda Dalam Putusan Kasus Narkotika." Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2015.
R. Subekti. Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2005.
Jurnal, Skripsi, Tesis Disertasi :
Nursiti dan Fakhrullah. "Disparitas Penjatuhan Pidana Kurungan Pengganti Pidana Denda Dalam Putusan Kasus Narkotika." Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2015.
Roni Gunawan Raja Gukguk, Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya. "Tindak Pidana Narkotika Sebagai Transnasional Organized Crime." Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1, No. 3, 2019.
Siti Nabilah Utami, Anggun Nurul Isma, Gialdah Tapiansari B, Faris Fachrizal Jodi. "Penerapan Teori Pemidanaan Oleh Hakim Terhadap Putusan Pidana Pada Perkara Narkotika." Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pasundan, 2023.
Tabiu R., Intan N., & Safiuddin S. "Globalisasi dan Kejahatan Transnasional Terorganisasi." Halu Oleo Law Review, 2023.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan :
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)
Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Putusan Pengadilan :
Putusan Nomor : 2050/Pid. Sus/2021/PN Tng
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohamad Elang Pramudya, Bambang Widarto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.