TINJAUAN PEMENUHAN ASAS-ASAS UMUM PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK TERHADAP PENGATURAN JANGKA WAKTU PEMERIKSAAN PAJAK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.08221/lexlaguens.v4i1.248Keywords:
Tax Audit, AUPB, Legal Certainty, Good GovernanceAbstract
This study aims to analyze the fulfillment of the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB) regarding the regulation of tax audit timeframes as stipulated in the Minister of Finance Regulation Number 15 of 2025 concerning Tax Audits. The regulation of tax audit timeframes is an important instrument in tax administration law because it is directly related to legal certainty, protection of taxpayer rights, and limitations on the authority of tax authorities. In practice, although the regulation has set a clear audit timeframe, its implementation still raises debate, especially when the audit exceeds the specified timeframe but is still considered valid by the court decision. The research method used is normative juridical legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The data used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through literature studies and analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that normatively the regulation of tax audit timeframes in PMK Number 15 of 2025 has reflected the principles of AUPB, particularly the principles of legal certainty, accountability, openness, professionalism, and proportionality. However, in practice, the application of audit timeframes has not been fully consistent with these principles. The Supreme Court's decision permitting audits to extend beyond the time limit demonstrates that procedural compliance is often disregarded in pursuit of material tax truth. This situation creates legal uncertainty for taxpayers and demonstrates that the AUPB has not yet fully functioned as a binding standard of review in tax audit practice. Therefore, strengthening regulations that emphasize the legal consequences of exceeding the audit time limit is needed, so that the time limit truly functions as a limit on administrative authority that provides legal protection for taxpayers and strengthens good governance in the tax sector.
References
Anta, I. G. “Determinan Efektivitas Pemeriksaan Pajak Menurut Persepsi Pemeriksa Pajak.” Jurnal San Pajak Indonesia. Vol. 7 No. 1. 2023.
Ikhsan, F., dan D. Sulastri. “Kedudukan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik (AUPB) sebagai Tolak Ukur Normatif.” Qanuniya: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Vol. 2 No. 2. 2025.
Indymadjid, Rayhan Zidane. “Peran Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Dan Hukum Acara.” Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara. Vol. 1 No. 4. 2024.
Jenita, Asri. “Dampak Kebijakan Hukum Pajak terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pustaka Aktiva (Pusat Akses Kajian Akuntansi, Manajemen, Investasi, dan Valuta). Vol. 5 No. 1. 2025.
Putra, Rizki Permana, dan Abdur Razak. “Efektifitas Jangka Waktu Penyelesaian Pemeriksaan Pajak Oleh Pemeriksa Pajak Pada Kantor Wilayah DJP Jawa Barat I.” Jurnal Media Administrasi Terapan. Vol. 5 No. 2. 2025.
Santosa, P. Administrasi Publik: Teori dan Aplikasi Good Governance. Jakarta: Refika Aditama. 2008.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press. 2006.
Tarigan, Ridwan Syaidi. Menuju Negara Hukum Yang Berkeadilan. Jakarta: Ruang Karya Bersama. 2024.
Walinono, Andi Muhammad Iqbal, A. Muin Fahmal, dan Satrih Hasyim. “Peranan Asas-Asas Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Yang Baik Dan Bersih.” Journal of Lex Theory (JLT). Vol. 6 No. 2. 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Wahyudi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










